The Scourge Of Socialism

On By EmtibuLeave a comment

Socialists are blood suckers. They are parasites who contribute nothing to the world. Their main products are grievance, envy, and greed. All they do is look at what other people have and think that just because of their own existence, they have a right to what others own. Think about it for a second. Ask yourself what socialism has ever done to make the world a better place. How has this ideology ever improved the lot of anyone? They talk about the so-called unequal distribution of wealth as though there is a big stash of so-called wealth lying down in the middle of some central location in the world, and a group of distributors are handing out “wealth.”

Observe most of the prominent socialists who are always sowing discontent, though. They think they have a right to their wealth. They are never willing to set the example with their own possessions, by giving it to the government to hand out to whoever the government wants. They are massive hypocrites with their millions stashed away, their summer homes and fancy condos. They are leeches who ride the capitalist system, then when so much wealth has been created, they begin to demand that other powerful people have the power to give away what the creators have earned.

Can anyone name one country or region, of anywhere in the world, that built a society on the principles of socialism? What? Okay, that’s because one does not exist, never has. Yet the proponents of this scam continue to get away with the ruse, pretending that they care so much, but don’t believe them. What they want is the easy way out. What they want is the power to seize what others have earned to carry out their failed experiments, to compensate for their own incompetence. Ask the people of Argentina about what happened when the greedy, evil socialists moved in and seized those pension funds and confiscated them for the Government. It’s because of the Capitalist system that people were able to have enough money that the Government could steal in the first place. Charity is a voluntary thing. It is not coerced. And we have a history of charitable people contributing their resources to the advancement of humanity based on their own altruism, or for whatever reasons they do it. The socialist does not believe in voluntary charity; they believe in compulsory confiscation.

For all of this, for all of their failure and the misery they have caused all over the world; somehow these people with an abysmal record of failure manage to convince millions that this scourge of humanity is something amazing. That may be a result of the education system we have, and the indoctrination that takes place in these institutions all across America and the world. That’s why it is so important to push back against the narrative in our schools, in our media, and in our culture.

The principle of liberty, owning private property, and free enterprise (and belief and trust in God) are the principles that we have to champion. Make it a priority to teach children there is no fixed pot of wealth that exists for the power brokers to divide by force. Show them that individual talent, how people harness it, hard work, dedication, the willingness to take risk, and through innovation is how people create wealth. The Utopia funded by other people’s money that socialists promise, that place does not exist. It is a figment of the imagination that is destructive and not worth the price. It is one of the most terrible lies that has ever been told. The path of socialism always leads to the same destination that ends in economic ruin, the loss of freedom, and the eventual reign of tyranny led by a ruling class who live the lives of luxury they claim to despise. In the meantime the people they claim to liberate stand in breadlines. It is hard to state how important the fight against this ideology is. We cannot overstate it. It is a fight for human dignity and the very soul of humanity.

Following Candace Owens Advice And Asking Questions

On By EmtibuLeave a comment

Let’s take a page out of Candace Owens’ own playbook and start by asking questions. Not accusations, just questions. The same way she does.

Because at this point, it’s hard not to wonder: what exactly is going on with Candace Owens?

For years, she built her reputation as one of the fiercest defenders of conservative values. We watched her dismantle bad arguments in real time. We saw her stand before Congress and refuse to be intimidated. She was sharp, fearless, and absolutely in command of the facts. She earned her credibility the hard way, by showing up and fighting.

So why does her recent behavior feel so… off?

Some people used to whisper that she wasn’t really a conservative, that she was some kind of plant. Back then, that sounded ridiculous. She had the receipts. She had the moments. She had the fire. If anything, she seemed like one of the most effective voices the movement had.

But now? Watching her go after TPUSA and tear into Charlie Kirk’s legacy with such intensity, it raises questions. Not conclusions. Just questions. If someone were trying to infiltrate a movement, how would they do it? They’d build trust. They’d prove themselves. They’d become indispensable. And then, when the moment was right, they’d strike. Again, this is not an accusation. It’s simply applying Candace’s own method of inquiry to Candace herself.

And her recent behavior is, frankly, curious. The sudden shift on Israel was the first red flag for many. After years of working with two of the most pro‑Israel organizations in the country, PragerU and The Daily Wire, she pivoted sharply. Not toward nuanced criticism, but toward emotionally charged commentary, questionable sources, and even repeating historically dangerous myths. That alone created a fracture in the conservative movement between pro Israel voices and those newly emboldened to oppose the nation.

Then came her current war against TPUSA. With the tragedy of Charlie Kirk still fresh, she launched into a sweeping, conspiratorial narrative suggesting that people close to him were somehow involved in his murder. Not based on evidence, by her own admission, but on her “gut.” In here ow words she “doesn’t know know, but she knows.”Suddenly, ordinary actions by TPUSA staff were framed as suspicious. A yawn. A scratch. A cough. A movement. A glance. All spun into a web of insinuation.

And now she’s attacking Erika Kirk, who is trying to navigate unimaginable grief while stepping into leadership. Owens’ commentary has unleashed a wave of hostility toward Erika, accusations, insults, and wild speculation, none of which is grounded in anything but Candace’s own suspicions.

The result? TPUSA is forced into a defensive crouch at the exact moment they should be unified and focused.

Candace says she’s doing all this because Charlie was her friend. But her narrative requires believing that Charlie Kirk was surrounded by traitors, deceived by his own wife, and blind to the people he trusted most. That’s a heavy claim to hang on nothing more than intuition.

So again, in the spirit of Candace’s own rhetorical style, we ask: Is this simply a case of someone going off the rails or a new set of convictions. Or did she embed herself in major conservative institutions, build major goodwill, and then uses that influence to fracture the movement from within. Remember now. This is not an accusation, just a question, the same kind she would ask.

The Hypocrisy And Privilege Of The Class Warrior

On By EmtibuLeave a comment

So here’s a question for those like Zohran Mamdani and Alexander Ocasio Cortez, who so passionately rail against the rich: do they include themselves in the very group they constantly malign for their wealth?

Are they entitled to their possessions? What exactly does “rich” mean according to Mr. Mamdani? Does he look at Bernie Sanders, with his four houses and millions in the bank, and see the same villain he urges others to hate? Should he be able to use the force of the state to take one of Bernie’s houses and give it to some poor homless person who needs it more than Bernies does. Is Bernie Sanders one of these evil millionaires? Is Bernie Sanders entitled to his millions? What has he done that is of greater value than the millionaires and billionaires he and his allies so relentlessly attack?

This is the grand hypocrisy of the class-warrior politician: to be entitled to their own privilege while casting it as a sin in others. Why is Mamdani, along with all the other Democrat millionaires in Congress, entitled to their fortunes while simultaneously castigating others for having theirs?

These politicians are playing the public for fools. Their rhetoric isn’t designed to uplift; it’s designed to inflame. They contribute nothing of substance, instead appealing to the worst instincts of envy and resentment. They tell people that what others have should be condemned, except, of course, when it comes to their own wealth and privilege.

At its core, their philosophy is built on envy and entitlement: a creed that measures its worth not by what it has built, but by what it wishes to take. It is a politics of division, not progress, and it thrives on resentment rather than responsibility.

That is why we have to fight this sentiment wherever it appears. We must teach young people the values of hard work, perseverance, and personal responsibility. We must stand up against the corrosive idea that success is something to be punished, and instead celebrate that success, not as a crime to be punished, but a triumph to be celebrated.

Even Scripture warns us against this destructive mindset: “You shall not covet your neighbor’s house… or anything that belongs to your neighbor” (Exodus 20:17). The Tenth Commandment makes it clear that envy is not a virtue but a vice that erodes the soul and corrodes society. This directive from the finger of God is a bedrock of a functional society that rejects covetousness, looking at what others have and imagining it should be ours. We must choose creation over complaint and learn the profound satisfaction of earning one’s place in the world, instead of the bitter emptiness that comes from demanding what others have earned through ther own efforts. “Let us reserve our contempt for true poisons of the soul like resentment, grievance, and jealousy.”

Say It Again, America First Does Not Mean America Alone

On By EmtibuLeave a comment

It’s a silly idea to think that “America First” means “America Alone.” Nature abhors a vacuum, and make no mistake: there are many unsavory nations in the world eager to rush in and fill any void America leaves if this nation pivots toward an isolationist posture.

America needs allies. It is in our interest to partner with other nations, to form alliances, and to render aid when necessary. It is in our interest to strengthen bonds that serve both our security and our prosperity. America’s strength is best expressed through the full spectrum of DIME — our Diplomatic, Informational, Military, and Economic power. Each element is most effective when America is engaged with the world, not retreating from it.

Now, the real question is not whether America should work with others, but how. When should we extend aid, how much should we provide, and under what conditions? Those are worthy debates. But one thing is certain: America cannot go it alone in the world. We must position ourselves to leverage the relationships we have so that, in the end, everyone benefits, a true win, win situation.

The people who insist that “America First” means “America Alone” are simply wrong. America First means leading wisely, partnering strategically, and ensuring that our nation’s strength, (Diplomatic, Informational, Military, and Economic) is magnified through cooperation, not diminished by isolation.

What Does It Mean When a Man Says He Feels Like a Woman? Is Tt A C laim To An Experience He Can Truly Know?

On By EmtibuLeave a comment

Does he understand what it means to live in a body that is, on average, physically weaker and more vulnerable to threats?

Apart from physical vulnerability, does he know the psychological exhaustion of constantly assessing risk— is this a good place to park? Should I wear this? How should I react to this stranger? Has he felt the constant vigilance many women carry, simply walking alone at night?

Does he grasp the unique healthcare burdens women face, fertility, hormonal health and fluctuations, the lifelong complexities of gynecological care?

Can he truly comprehend the sexual pressures and risks women navigate, from objectification to assault, and the psychological toll that follows?

Has he lived under the weight of gender-based prejudices that women sometimes suffer?

Does a man appreciate the profound, often indescribable experience of being able to carry life within—of pregnancy, childbirth, and the emotional aftermath?

Does he know what it’s like to carry a child for nine months, to feel kicks from within, to wake with cravings that won’t let sleep return?

Has he faced the emotional storm of postpartum depression, the identity shift of motherhood, or the moral weight of choosing whether to carry a pregnancy to term?

Do people look to him with the expectation that he be the emotional caretaker, the one to soothe, comfort, nurture?

Does he know the pressure to have, the turmoil of deciding to have, and the aftermath of having an abortion?

Has he endured the physical pain and emotional turbulence of a menstrual cycle?

Who is the man that has experienced the hormonal upheaval, physical discomfort of menopause, not to mention the social invisibility that often accompanies it?

Does a man know what it feels like to have a miscarriage, or the pressure of a ticking biological clock?

For any man who says he feels like a woman, what exactly does that mean?

Once Again, Truth Is Not A Left Wing Value

On By EmtibuLeave a comment

Folks, listen to me well. I don’t know how else to say this except to say it plainly. You may think this is just partisan rhetoric—an attempt to make the other side look bad—but I assure you, that’s not what this is about. This is about driving a point home, again and again, until it registers. You cannot afford to miss this. It’s that important.

So here it is, one more time. Are you ready? Truth is not a left-wing value.

Now, I’m not saying the left lies. Telling lies is a human flaw. People from every ideology lie. That’s human nature. What I am saying—just in case you missed it the first thousand times—is that truth is not a cherished principle of the left. In fact, it’s often a hindrance to their agenda. Truth offends them. And when it doesn’t align with their messaging, they treat it like a medieval townsperson treated the Black Death in the 14th century—slam the shutters, light a candle, and pray it goes away before it infects the whole narrative.

Let me be clear: my claim isn’t emotional. It’s not driven by hate. I’m not trying to smear anyone. This isn’t me doing what the left does—pulling accusations out of thin air and branding their opponents as threats to democracy, misogynists, xenophobes, and so on. (Which, by the way, is part of their strategy: weaponizing lies).

No, this is based on hard, undeniable evidence. Case in point: the Government shutdown. For the past 40 days, the Republican-controlled House of Representatives has passed a continuing resolution to keep the government open. In the Senate, every Republican except one has voted to pass it. If only a simple majority were needed, the bill would’ve passed. But because it requires 60 votes, at least eight Democrats needed to join the Republicans.

Fourteen times, Senate Republicans voted yes. Fourteen times, Senate Democrats voted no—except for three of their members. So despite the House passing the bill and the Senate having over 52 Senators voting yes, the government remains shut down because Democrats refused to cross the aisle.

And yet, both leaders of the Democrat minority have the audacity to insist this is a Republican shutdown. Do you understand the kind of cajones it takes to sell a lie like that? But because truth matters so little to them, they gave it their all. They went after it with gusto. Even after being confronted by many of their allies in the legacy media, they clung tighter to the lie—trying to convince everyone that despite using the filibuster to block the vote, it’s still somehow the Republicans’ fault.

My friends, that takes nerve. That requires a kind of flagrant, in your face bravado that is theatrical in its dishonesty. The kind that looks you dead in the eye, spits out the lie, and dares you to flinch. But we’ve seen this allegiance to lies before, haven’t we?

Most recently, in the death of Charlie Kirk (not to go off script to much, just to make the point with something that is still relatively fresh). To justify their lack of humanity, to give cover to their indecency and moral vacancy, they lied—twisting his words, trying to distort his legacy, and slandering his character. Not because they believed what they were saying, about him, but because the truth didn’t serve their narrative. So they just lied. And that’s the point. Lies aren’t just a flaw that surfaces from time to time. For the left, they are a tool. A strategy. A way of life.

Don’t ever forget that—or you do it at your own peril.

Socialists Always Want Other People’s Stuff

On By EmtibuLeave a comment

When a person has an idea for a product or service, or they work on developing a talent, and puts in the time, the work, and the effort into developing it; it is that individual who deserves the fruit of that labor, and no one else.

As long as that person pays the remunerations all parties agreed on, to the people who helped them along the way, and meets all legal obligations; then all other rewards belong to them. It belongs to them because it is their idea, their product, their talent, their work behind it.

When a person starting a business, or trying to develop  an idea runs into financial difficulty, that individual still has to meet his or her obligation to pay workers, whether or not the business makes a profit. 

The entrepreneurs are the ones who have to deal with legal issues. When someone threatens to sue them, they are the ones who have to defend the business, and deal with the stress of the situation. They have to hire lawyers and pay the exorbitant fees for lawyer services . 

When people accuse the business of being unscrupulous, taking shortcuts, not following regulations etc. it is the entrepreneur who has to content with that.

They workers seldom know what is going on behind the scenes. They don’t experience sleepless nights because a competitor is trying to ruin them. It is the entrepreneur who who wakes up at 2 am after going to bed at 12:29 because he was trying to resolve a problem that threatens to put him out of business.

The workers show up happy to put in their time, clock out and draw the checks they freely agreed to in exchange for their work, without any idea of what it takes to continue receiving them. 

Workers don’t experience the anxiety, the uncertainty the business owner deals with constantly. They don’t know  the fear of failure that is common for the entrepreneur. They don’t know what it is to sacrifice family in pursuit of business success, or making their idea work. 

No one but the entrepreneur has days of simply running out of options, and just taking chance on himself by using his mortgage money, or rent money, or failing to meet some other obligation, to invest in their dream just to keep it alive.

When the banks come knocking, they do not knock on the doors of anyone else but the entrepreneurs.

Then when the business is  finally successful, problems do not diminish. They have to continue dealing with all the pressures, and unseen circumstances and challenges that continue going on behind the scenes of running a successful business. 

As the entrepreneur begins to reap the rewards of his business, along comes some envious socialist who demands that she distributes to others what she has earned, because it is unfair for one person to have so much money while there is so much suffering in the world. 

Or they tell you that the profits should be distributed equally among the workers because it is the workers who built the business. They say that no one person should have all of that money, and that it is unfair because there are so many who do not even earn in one year what the entrepreneur earns in a week.

They become greedy, covetous, resentful, and filled with jealousy, demanding that the Government take more and more of what the entrepreneur has built. Why?…because it is unfair for one person to have so much while so many have so little. That’s the excuse.

They think that the Government should be the arbiter of fairness with other people’s money. The free exchange of goods and services between suppliers and customers, or the free willed agreement between employers and employee is never good enough for them.

They want Government to move in with the power and force of the state to make all things “fair,” or “equal,” whatever any of that means.

Some of them even espouse the idea that the entrepreneur should not have the right to leave his fortune to whomsoever he or she chooses. Not even their children should be able to inherit all of their wealth. 

Some outside bureaucratic government agency or law should be in charge of deciding how that money should be dispersed. We know with government being as efficient and resistant to corruption as they are, that is bound to go swimmingly. 

The idea of personal property means nothing to them. They think that because some people are selfish and greedy with their own stuff they have earned or acquired, then they should lose their God given rights of ownership.

The attitude of these socialists, demonstrates the worst of human nature. It’s built on greed, envy and resentment, disguised as compassion. They look at what others have and think they have a right to it, or the government has a right to it on behalf of others. 

These qualities are just as bad as the greed they condemn. It is perhaps even worse, but they don’t see it.

Remember How The Left Treated Trump

On By EmtibuLeave a comment

As the left continues to pontificate and pretend that they are better than the rest of us, don’t forget that during Trump’s inauguration leftist mobs raged and rioted on the streets of Washington D.C. They smashed cars, and store fronts. They got in violent confrontations with the police. They set cars on fire, and damaged police vehicles.

Who can forget the dramatic picture of a stretch limo that was set on fire by the marauding hordes of protestors? By the time it was over the police had arrested over 200 agitators.

The mob did not restrict their actions to Washington D.C. though, they took their protests to cities across America during the inauguration. How about when on the day after the inauguration, leftist agitators shouted “not my President?” They blocked highways and other roadways, and in Portland they even caused the delay of trains.

After Trump was inaugurated the FBI put out information to the media about a supposed dossier that showed Trump paid prostitutes to pee on a bed on which Obama had slept, then based on absolutely nothing they launched a three year attack accusing Trump of being a Russian stooge (the investigation was not launched because of the “Russia if you are listening statement” during the campaign).

67 Congresspeople refused to attend his inauguration. Members of Hollywood, and a member of the Obama administration called for military action against him.

Democrats and the leftist news media proceeded to call Trump all sorts of names. Even former spy chiefs James Clapper and Paul Brennan were all over the airwaves, suggesting and saying that Trump is a Russian asset. For the entire four years that Trump was President they never let up from their attacks. To this day Hillary Clinton continues to refer to Trump’s tenure as President as illegitimate.

We had Maxine Waters encouraging people to get aggressive and harass members of Trump’s team in gas stations, theaters, and supermarkets. Wearing a MAGA hat became a potential hazard to the wearer. Celebrities were on Twitter and all over the media competing to see who could attack Trump in the most vile manner. Many openly spoke of how delighted they would be if he died a violent death.

The Democrats did everything in their power to sabotage Trump’s every move. They could not even rejoice when he killed two of the most violent terrorists responsible for the deaths of Americans across the globe. Even that was an occasion for them to criticize Trump.

They called Trump every nasty name in the book. For the entire four years of his Presidency, Tump was unable to find any cooperation from the Democrat Party. They railed, and they railed, and they railed against him down to his last days.

They impeached him for asking the leader of Ukraine to “interfere in the Presidential election.” There was nothing in the transcript of Trump’s call with the Ukrainian President that showed any such request. There was literally no discussion about the elections in the call that the Democrats accused him of making, but that’s not all.

In a hurried manner, they impeached Trump for purportedly inciting an insurrection, without affording him any opportunity to defend himself. This happened over the period of a few days. No one could produce any video, audio or any evidence of Trump inciting the so called insurrection, but that did not matter. Dirtying up Trump on his way out as much as they could was the goal.

This is not even a quarter of the story. Make sure to remember all of this. Don’t be vindictive. Do not resort to their tactics, but certainly do not play by their rules.

Now they are going after Trump in the courts in a way that we never thought we’d see in America, while they gas light us telling us all of this is normal procedure.

Don’t let these people lecture you.

Trump’s Mental Decline

On By EmtibuLeave a comment

The recent attempt by Democrats to paint Donald Trump as senile have been comical at best.

You listen to them and you know what the term gas lighting means.

Even Nancy Pelosi and President Biden himself have joined to act. Now let a vivid picture of these two come to mind.

It’s so comical that getting offended is not even an option. The natural response should be to lose yourself in hysterical as laughter. Seriously, what other response is there?

On the other hand you know you have to call them out and make sure that everyone recognizes how ludicrous these claims of Trump’s mental decline are.

Even though you recognize the criticisms of Trump’s mental state for the prime time Comedy Central material they are, you can never make the error of letting their rhetoric go unchallenged.

The leftist frauds masquerading as media have the tendency to take anything a Democrat says and turn it into an annoying theme song that tends to stick in the minds of the incurious, unthinking drones who listen to them.

So go ahead. Laugh at these fools as they try to gaslight everyone into thinking that Trump is going off his rocker, but remind them of the eggshell in a suit dragging around around the White House, who also happens to be the current President of the United States.

Put these people to shame with every chance you get.

The Trump Phenomenon And The Effort To Take Him Out

On By EmtibuLeave a comment

Ladies and gentlemen, when Donald Trump announced his run for President, I too, began to laugh. I’m talking about rib tickling, side splitting, thigh slapping, head flinging, stomach holding, rolling on the ground laughter. I guffawed like you could not imagine.

Then I observed the way the establishment responded to him. Sure he was outlandish. He was crude at times. He was rude at other times, and he certainly did not possess the aura of what we call Presidential.

It was obvious the guy is a joke, but come on, the process will weed out the pretenders like him, and the best man will be left standing tall.

In the early days when leftists tried to disrupt his campaign at rallies, it was hard to believe when Trump told his supporters at one time that he would pay their legal defense bills, when some of his supporters physically went after a few of the unhinged lefties at the rallies.

Was this guy really encouraging violence?

That is crazy!

The media rightly took him to task for that, then he corrected it before it really got out of hand.

Here’s the irony though, after that, the people at Trump rallies often became the targets of violent leftist attacks, and the same media that was so rightly outraged at the couple incidents of mild by comparison attacks on leftist agitators, refused to cover leftist violence against Trump supporters with the same vigor.

Trump was the only candidate physically attacked on stage, and his supporters suffered some really brutal attacks throughout the campaign. The San Jose rally comes to mind.

What was the reason for the one sided approach by the media?

Then there was the “Russia if you are listening” comment by Trump.

One could only think, this guy is out of control!

Trump was obviously making the point that Hillary’s private e-mail was exposed to foreign surveillance, and was a national security risk because she did not have any of the network protections/security that is usually in place for such high level Government employee communications, but seriously, that comment by Trump was way out there.

There was no way he could win right?

Then after starting to pay attention, and listening to what he was actually saying, minus the side show stuff, the guy made the most sense of all the candidates.

These were just a few of the things Trump spoke on:

NATO countries not meeting their financial obligations while America fits most of the bill.

The rise of ISIS and the policies that were hindering the Military defeating this threat.

China’s unfair trade practices and their constant theft of American intellectual property.

American’s endless wars.

The climate nonsense stifling the economy and preventing America from gaining energy independence.

The porous border and a failing immigration system.

The substandard circumstances, and living conditions of too many black people.

When it came to policy, Trump was on target.

His comments about illegal immigrants coming from Mexico were not particularly offensive.

They sounded more like hard truths the politically correct did not want said than bigotry to me. Certainly not what the open borders advocates would say, but definitely not an opinion so over the top to evoke the kind of response by the media, and others in the ruling class.

Trump still seemed like a side show though, but the venemous hostility toward him certainly was grabbing my attention more and more.

That raw, naked, nasty relentless aggression to take Trump out, and all the dirty tricks against him made me stop and take notice.

Then Trump started to become more appealing.

Some questions needed answers. How is it possible that almost all of the reporting on one politician would be so one sided, no matter what the issue was.

No matter what the guy did or said, the reporting was overwhelmingly negative.

How is it that in all the media coverage of this man, he’s never given the benefit of the doubt on any single issue?

Not once have we ever seen the media carefully scrutinize the other side of any negative story on Trump, and treated it with any curiosity. His surrogates never got to come on any program and lay out their case in anything but a hostile environment.

All these years later, and the same unwavering pursuit to take out this one man has convinced me that there is more to this.

All of the norms, and the protocols that the media and others have been so willing to abandon in order to stop this dude is not normal.

With all the knives, darts, bullets and missiles that have been pulled out and targeted against Trump in the last few years, thinking people are supposed to look at all of it and just go “meh, nothing unusual happening here. This is just routine stuff.”

Nah bruh!

The establishment has spoken. The message is loud and could not be clearer. Heed their warning! If you want to be involved in American politics, all are welcome, but you will play the game by their rules.

You’d better get rid of any ideas you may have about challenging their influence, their methods of doing business, their goals, or the mechanisms they employ to achieve their goals.

You will play by their rules or they will destroy you.

Play ball or else.